|
Post by michele5611 on Feb 28, 2013 23:36:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by catstina on Mar 1, 2013 8:52:53 GMT -5
"while there was no evidence foul play was involved, certain symptoms were consistent with dogs who ingest rat or mouse poison. That was the reason she said she decided against a necropsy – an autopsy for animals." What? Why wouldn't you want to know!?
|
|
|
Post by catstina on Mar 1, 2013 8:53:54 GMT -5
"Ingrid Newkirk said "it makes no sense whatsoever" that an animal rights activist would harm an animal.
"It's a fantasy, it's a fallacy," she told the AP by phone Thursday night. "How dare you point a finger and cast aspersions when you haven't a clue.""
Yeah, they only kill dogs in their shelters...
|
|
|
Post by michele5611 on Mar 1, 2013 22:06:13 GMT -5
It's preposterous that an animal rights activist would harm an animal per Ingrid....pot meet kettle.
|
|