|
Post by michele5611 on May 9, 2014 10:08:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by emilys on May 9, 2014 14:20:01 GMT -5
This was a f'ng set up. The dog, as defined in its own registration paper work was NOT an actual service dog, but a therapy dog (which doesn't have the protection of the ADA) and should never have been registered as such. Tell me Yakima, which didn't want to allow SD service dogs and whose muzzling/kenneling requirements probably violate the ADA, and whose AC is being quoted as "it was inevitable", didn't want this incident to happen and didn't facilitate it
|
|